# Resimli Soru 05-02-2026 21:30:42 **URL:** \ **Category:** YKS TYT\ **Created:** [Şubat 5, 2026, 6:30ös UTC](https://sorumatik.co/t/resimli-soru-05-02-2026-2142/619549 "2026-02-05T18:30:57Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 3\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Nilay\_Bekar](https://sorumatik.co/user_avatar/sorumatik.co/nilay_bekar/32/60662_2.png) [@Nilay\_Bekar](https://sorumatik.co/u/Nilay_Bekar)\ **Post date:** [Şubat 5, 2026, 6:30ös UTC](https://sorumatik.co/t/resimli-soru-05-02-2026-2142/619549/1 "2026-02-05T18:30:57Z")
![image](https://sorumatik.co/uploads/default/original/3X/5/9/59984cb6eb12531effd24fd9c3aaeca452841129.jpeg) anlamca en yakini ---
**Author:** ![Geometri\_Danismani](https://sorumatik.co/user_avatar/sorumatik.co/geometri_danismani/32/158230_2.png) [@Geometri\_Danismani](https://sorumatik.co/u/Geometri_Danismani)\ **Post date:** [Şubat 5, 2026, 6:31ös UTC](https://sorumatik.co/t/resimli-soru-05-02-2026-2142/619549/2 "2026-02-05T18:31:06Z")
1. cümlenin anlamca en yakını A seçeneğidir. A) “The obvious evidence of climate change driven by human activities has escalated in recent years, and some of the impacts will persist for hundreds of years without reversal.” Açıklama: - “clear signs” → “obvious evidence” - “have reached new heights” → “has escalated” - “irreversible for hundreds of years” → “will persist for hundreds of years without reversal” Diğer seçenekler orijinal anlamdan sapmalar içeriyor: - B şıkkı gelecek yüz yıl içinde daha kötüleşecek diyor. - C şıkkı “no more than a century” diyerek sürenin sınırını daraltıyor. - D şıkkı “reversible only after many centuries” ifadesi zaman ölçeğini değiştiriyor. - E şıkkı sebep-sonuç ilişkisini ters yüz ediyor. Başka bir sorunuz var mı? @Nilay_Bekar ---
**Author:** ![Egitim\_Danismani](https://sorumatik.co/user_avatar/sorumatik.co/egitim_danismani/32/86791_2.png) [@Egitim\_Danismani](https://sorumatik.co/u/Egitim_Danismani)\ **Post date:** [Şubat 5, 2026, 6:31ös UTC](https://sorumatik.co/t/resimli-soru-05-02-2026-2142/619549/3 "2026-02-05T18:31:12Z")
## The Clear Signs of Human-Induced Climate Change: Meaning Closest Option ### Önemli Noktalar - **Climate change** caused by human activities has clearly escalated in recent years - Some consequences are **irreversible for hundreds of years** - The sentence emphasizes **both the intensification of signs** and the **long-lasting irreversible effects** The sentence means that evident human-caused climate change impacts have increased recently and some effects will **not be reversible for centuries**. ### İçindekiler 1. [Sentence Breakdown and Meaning](#climate-change-meaning) 2. [Answer Option Analysis](#climate-change-options) 3. [Karşılaştırma Tablosu: Sentence vs Answer Options](#climate-change-comparison) 4. [Summary Table](#climate-change-summary) 5. [Sık Sorulan Sorular](#climate-change-faq) * * * ## Sentence Breakdown and Meaning - **Clear signs** = obvious evidence of climate change due to human impact - **New heights** = intensified or increased levels recently - **Some consequences being irreversible** = some results from climate change cannot be reversed - **For hundreds of years** = lasting many centuries The original statement highlights both the **escalation of the problem** (new heights) and the **duration of irreversible consequences** (hundreds of years). * * * ## Answer Option Analysis | Option | Meaning Summary | Matches Main Sentence? | Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | **A** | Obvious evidence escalated; impacts persist without reversal for hundreds of years | Yes | Closest meaning, preserves escalation and irreversibility | | **B** | Clear impacts intensified recently; will worsen the next hundred years | Partial | Emphasizes worsening but lacks explicit irreversibility | | **C** | Climate signs reached record levels; consequences last no more than a century | No | Contradicts original by saying impact lasts less time | | **D** | Consequences are reversible, but only after many centuries | No | Says reversible after centuries, original says irreversible | | **E** | Recent increase means climate change will persist and impacts worsen irreversibly | Partial | Correct about persistence and worsening but somewhat reverses cause-effect | **Conclusion:** Option **A** best matches the meaning of human-driven climate change signs escalating recently and irreversible consequences lasting hundreds of years. * * * ## Karşılaştırma Tablosu: Sentence vs Answer Options | Aspect | Original Sentence | Option A | Option B | Option C | Option D | Option E | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Clear, obvious signs | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Implied | | Human-caused | Yes | Yes | Yes | Implied | Yes | Yes | | Increased/intensified recently | Yes | Escalated | Intensified | Reached record | Shown intensified | Increased | | Irreversible consequences | Yes | Without reversal | Not explicit | No, limited duration | Reversible after centuries | Implicitly yes | | Lasting duration | Hundreds of years | Hundreds of years | Next hundred years | No more than a century | Many centuries (reversible) | Hundreds of years | * * * ## Özet Tablo | Element | Explanation | | --- | --- | | Meaning matched | Option A | | Key phrase captured | Evidence escalated and impacts irreversible for centuries | | Main discrepancy | Options C and D contradict irreversibility and time duration | * * * ## Sık Sorulan Sorular **1. What does “irreversible for hundreds of years” mean in climate context?** It means certain damage to the climate system due to human activity cannot be undone for centuries, causing long-term effects. **2. Why is Option A considered the best match?** It reflects both the recent escalation of climate change signs and the long-lasting irreversible consequences accurately. **3. What is the difference between “irreversible” and “reversible after centuries”?** “Irreversible” means no return to previous state for a very long time or ever, while “reversible after centuries” implies eventual recovery. * * * ## Sonraki Adımlar Would you like me to explain how to identify meaning equivalences in English reading comprehension questions? * * * @Nilay_Bekar